Population structure and environmental degradation
Implication for EKC hypothesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36096/brss.v1i2.110Keywords:
CO2 emissions, population structure, ARDL bounds testing, Nigeria, EKC, economic growthAbstract
The primary objective of this paper is to test the hypothesis that the population age structure could contribute to carbon dioxide emission levels (environmental degradation) in Nigeria. Real income (Gross Domestic Product) was used as another determinant of CO2 emissions to test the EKC hypothesis in this study. Also, the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) econometric technique was applied in this paper to annual time series data from 1970 to 2018. The results show that age structure’s influence on the environment is significant. As expected, young adults (LOGYONG, i.e., ages 15-64) and children (LOGCHIL, i.e., ages 0-14) are environmentally intensive (due to energy-intensive goods consumed). But the older age group (LOGOLD i.e., ages 65 and above) exert a negative effect. The results of long-term estimation for the population structure-induced EKC hypothesis show that none of the coefficients of economic growth were statistically significant at any of the conventional levels. In other words, this finding did not prove the existence of EKC hypothesis. However, appropriate macroeconomic policies, technological innovations, and institutional developments are very important in maintaining a sound environment in Nigeria.
Downloads
References
Aboagye, S. (2017). Economic expansion and environmental sustainability nexus in Ghana, African Development Review, 29(2),155–168.
Akbostanci, E., Türüt-Asik, S., and Tunc, I.G. ( 2009). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve? Energy Policy, 37 (2), 861-867. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.088
Akinyemi, A., and Isiugo-Abanihe, U. C. (2014).Demographic dynamics and development in Nigeria, African Population Studies. 27(2), 239–248.
Akpan, G. E., and Akpan, U. F. (2012). Electricity consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Nigeria, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2(1), 292-306.
Chi, G.(2005). Debates on population and the environment, Popul.-Environ. Res. Netw. (PERN) Cyberseminar Popul. MDG7; 5–16 Sept.
Chindo, S., Abdulrahim, A., Waziri, S. I., Huong, W. M., and Ahmad, A. A. (2015). Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and GDP in Nigeria. Geo Journal, 80 (1), 315-322.
CIA (2018). The World Factbook — Central Intelligence Agency. www.cia.gov.
CIA (2019). Nigeria: people, CIA World Factbook, 2018. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ni.html
Cramer, C.J. (1998). Population growth and air quality in California, Demography,35(1), 45-56.
Cramer, J. C., and Cheney, R. P. (2000). Lost in the ozone: population growth and ozone in California, Population and Environment 21, (3), 315-337.
Dasgupta, P.S. (1995).Population, poverty, and the local environment. Sci Am.,272(1),40–46.
De Sherbinin, A., Carr, D., Cassels, S., and Jiang, L. (2007). Population and environment, Annu Rev Environ Resour., 32(1),345–373.
Demographic Dividend (2019). Nigeria. http://www.demographicdividend.org/country_highlights/nigeria/
Dietz, T., and Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 94, 175-179.
Dinda, S., & Coondoo, D. (2006). Income and emission: a panel data-based cointegration analysis, Ecological Economics, 57, 167-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.028
Drake, W. D. (1984). Towards building a theory of population-environment dynamics: a family of transitions. In G.D. Ness and H. Ando, eds., the land is shrinking: population planning in Asia. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Engle, R.F., and Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: rep¬resentation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
Fei, J., and Ranis, G. (1964). Development of the labor surplus economy, Homewood, Irwin, IL.
Ghanem, S. K. (2018). The relationship between population and the environment and its impact on sustainable development in Egypt using a multi-equation model, environment, development and sustainability: a multidisciplinary approach to the theory and practice of sustainable development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 305-342, February. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-016-9882-8
Global.com (2019). What is ARDL bounds testing. https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/ardl-bounds-testing/47420
Gray, L.C., and Moseley, W.G. (2005).A geographical perspective on poverty-environment interactions, Geogr J., 171(1),9–23.
Hunter, L. M. (2000).The environmental implications of population dynamics. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2000/MR1191.pdf
Indexmundi (2019). Population pyramid of Nigeria- 2016.https://www.indexmundi.com/nigeria/age_structure.html
Jolly, C.L. (1994). Four theories of population change and the environment, Popul Environ.,16(1),61–90.
Keyfitz, N. (1991).Population and development within the Ecophere: one view of the literature, Popul Index, 57(1),5–22.
Lantz, V., and Feng, Q. (2006.) Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where's the EKC? Ecological Economics 57(1), 229–238.
Lewis, W.A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor, The Manchester School.
Mabogunje, A. L. (1995). The environmental challenges in Sub Saharan Africa, Environment, 37(4), 4. http://web.mit.edu/africantech/www/articles/EnvChall.htm
McNicoll, G. (1992). Mediating factors linking population and the environment, presented at UN Expert Group Meet. Popul., Environ. Dev.; New York. 20–24, Jan.
Narayan, P.K., and Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries, Energy Policy, 38(1), 661-666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005
Nnaji, C. E., Chukwu, J. O., Nnaji, M. (2013). Electricity supply, fossil fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth: implications and policy options for sustainable development in Nigeria, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 3(1), 262-271.
O’Neill, .BC., MacKellar, F.L., and Lutz, W. (2001).Population and climate change, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Pesaran, M.H., Smith R.J., and Shin, Y. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(1), 289-326.
Rothman, D.S., and De Bruyn, S.M. (1998). Probing into the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis, Ecological Economics, 25(1),143–145.
Southgate, D. (1994). Tropical deforestation and agricultural development in LatinAmerica, In: The causes of tropical deforestation: the economic and statisticalanalysis of factors giving rise to the loss of tropical forests, edited by K. Brown andD. Pearce. London: University College London Press.
Stern, D.I. (2004). The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32, 1419–1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004
Sulaiman, C. (2014). The causality between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Nigeria: an application of Toda and Yamamoto procedure, Advances in Natural Applied Sciences, 8(1), 75-81.
United Nation (1994). Population and the environment in developing countries (ESA/P/WP.123). https://www.un.org/popin/books/wp1.html
York, R., Rosa, E.A., and Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts, Ecological Economics 46 (3), 351-365.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Bussecon Review of Social Sciences by Bussecon International Academy is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
