Environmental sustainability in South Africa's 3D printing sector: The roles of cost, technology adoption, and regulatory compliance

Ntokozo Dlamini; Thywill Cephas Dzogbewu; Dennis Yao Dzansi; Deon Johan de Beer

doi:10.36096/ijbes.v6i6.562

Authors

Ntokozo Dlamini Central University of Technology https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2311-2849
Thywill Cephas Dzogbewu Central University of Technology
Dennis Yao Dzansi Central University of Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3533-6255
Deon Johan de Beer Central University of Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-9556

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v6i6.562

Keywords:

environmental sustainability, 3D printing cost, 3D printing technology adoption, 3D printing regulatory compliance, 3D printing firms

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effect of 3D printing cost, 3D printing technology adoption and regulatory compliance on environmental sustainability among 3D printing firms in South Africa. The study also investigated the mediating effect of regulatory compliance on the relationships between 3D printing cost and 3D printing technology adoption on environmental sustainability. The study adopted a deductive research approach, quantitative research method and an explanatory correlational research design. Simple random sampling technique was used to select a total of 152 employees of 3D printing firms in South Africa. Questionnaires served as the data collection instruments, and online data gathering was done using Google Forms. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 software was used for data coding, data entry, and descriptive statistics. Smart PLS 4 was used to conduct partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modelling. Results of the study indicate that a significant negative relationship exists between 3D printing cost and environmental sustainability while a significant positive relationship was found to exist between 3D printing technology adoption and environmental sustainability among 3D printing firms in South Africa. A significant positive relationship also exists between 3D printing regulatory compliance and environmental sustainability. For mediation effects, it was found that 3D printing regulatory compliance negatively mediates the relationship between cost and environmental sustainability. The results also indicated that regulatory compliance does not mediate the relationship between 3D printing technology and environmental sustainability. The study concludes that, in as much as 3D printing costs and technology adoption are essential, regulatory compliance has significant role to play in ensuring the maximization of environmental sustainability in South Africa’s 3D printing industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adalbert, L., Kanti, S. Y., Jójárt-Laczkovich, O., Akel, H., & Csóka, I. (2022). Expanding quality by design principles to support 3D printed medical device development following the renewed regulatory framework in Europe. Biomedicines, 10(11), 2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112947

Adegbite, O. E., Simintiras, A. C., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Ifie, K. (2017). Organisational adaptations: A pluralistic perspective. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-63510-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63510-1

Aghimien, D., Aigbavboa, C., Aghimien, L., Thwala, W., & Ndlovu, L. (2021). 3D Printing for sustainable low-income housing in South Africa: A case for the urban poor. Journal of Green Building, 16(2), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.16.2.129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.16.2.129

Ahmad, S., Zulkurnain, N., & Khairushalimi, F. (2016). Assessing the validity and reliability of a measurement model in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 15(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMCS/2016/25183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMCS/2016/25183

Ahmed, R. R., & Streimikiene, D. (2021). Environmental issues and strategic corporate social responsibility for organizational competitiveness. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.01

Alami, A. H., Olabi, A. G., Alashkar, A., Alasad, S., Aljaghoub, H., Rezk, H., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2023). Additive manufacturing in the aerospace and automotive industries: Recent trends and role in achieving sustainable development goals. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(11), 102516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102516

Allouzi, R., Al-Azhari, W., & Allouzi, R. (2020). Conventional construction and 3D printing: A comparison study on material cost in Jordan. Journal of Engineering, 2020(1), 1424682. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1424682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1424682

Andreoni, A., & Tregenna, F. (2020). Escaping the middle-income technology trap: A comparative analysis of industrial policies in China, Brazil, and South Africa. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 54, 324-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.05.008

Attaran, M. (2017). Additive manufacturing: The most promising technology to alter the supply chain and logistics. Journal of Service Science and Management, 10(03), 189. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2017.103017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2017.103017

Awa, H. O., Ojiabo, O. U., & Orokor, L. E. (2017). Integrated technology-organization-environment (TOE) taxonomies for technology adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(6), 893-921. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2016-0079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2016-0079

Bhattacherjee, S., Basavaraj, A. S., Rahul, A. V., Santhanam, M., Gettu, R., Panda, B., & Mechtcherine, V. (2021). Sustainable materials for 3D concrete printing. Cement and Concrete Composites, 122, 104156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104156

Bianchi, I., Volpe, S., Fiorito, F., Forcellese, A., & Sangiorgio, V. (2024). Life cycle assessment of building envelopes manufactured through different 3D printing technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440, 140905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140905

Bours, J., Adzima, B., Gladwin, S., Cabral, J., & Mau, S. (2017). Addressing hazardous implications of additive manufacturing: Complementing life cycle assessment with a framework for evaluating direct human health and environmental impacts. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(S1), S25-S36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12587

Cerdas, F., Juraschek, M., Thiede, S., & Herrmann, C. (2017). Life cycle assessment of 3D printed products in a distributed manufacturing system. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(S1), S80-S93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12618

Chen, D., Heyer, S., Ibbotson, S., Salonitis, K., Steingrímsson, J. G., & Thiede, S. (2015). Direct digital manufacturing: Definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 615-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009

Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Chong, J., & Olesen, K. (2017). A technology-organization-environment perspective on eco-effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1441

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412. https://psycnet.apa.org/2019-14248-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626

Griffiths, C. A., Howarth, J., De Almeida-Rowbotham, G., Rees, A., & Kerton, R. (2016). A design of experiments approach for the optimisation of energy and waste during the production of parts manufactured by 3D printing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.182

Han, Y., Yang, Z., Ding, T., & Xiao, J. (2021). Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884

Huang, R., Riddle, M. E., Graziano, D., Das, S., Nimbalkar, S., Cresko, J., & Masanet, E. (2017). Environmental and economic implications of distributed additive manufacturing: The case of injection mold tooling. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(S1), S130–S143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12641

Jayakrishna, M., Vijay, M., & Khan, B. (2023). An overview of extensive analysis of 3D printing applications in the manufacturing sector. Journal of Engineering, 2023(1), 7465737. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7465737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7465737

Jiménez, M., Romero, L., Domínguez, I. A., Espinosa, M. D. M., & Domínguez, M. (2019). Additive manufacturing technologies: An overview about 3D printing methods and future prospects. Complexity, 2019(1), 9656938. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9656938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9656938

Khan, S. A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021). Sustainability assessment, potentials and challenges of 3D printed concrete structures: A systematic review for built environmental applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 127027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127027

Khosravani, M. R., & Reinicke, T. (2020). On the environmental impacts of 3D printing technology. Applied Materials Today, 20, 100689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100689

Kumar Gupta, D., Ali, M. H., Ali, A., Jain, P., Anwer, M. K., Iqbal, Z., & Mirza, M. A. (2022). 3D printing technology in healthcare: Applications, regulatory understanding, IP repository and clinical trial status. Journal of Drug Targeting, 30(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2021.1935973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2021.1935973

Montes, J. (2017). Risks and regulation of emerging technologies in chaotic and uncertain times: The case of 3D printing. 2017 International Conference on Infocom Technologies and Unmanned Systems (Trends and Future Directions) (ICTUS), 698–704. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTUS.2017.8286097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTUS.2017.8286097

Naghshineh, B., Ribeiro, A., Jacinto, C., & Carvalho, H. (2021). Social impacts of additive manufacturing: A stakeholder-driven framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120368

Nissan, A. M. (2016). Regulating the three-dimensional future: How the FDA should structure a regulatory mechanism for additive manufacturing (3D printing). BUJ Science & Technology Law, 22, 267. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jstl22&div=13

Nyika, J., Mwema, F. M., Mahamood, R. M., Akinlabi, E. T., & Jen, T. C. (2022). Advances in 3D printing materials processing-environmental impacts and alleviation measures. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 8(sup3), 1275–1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2021.1945311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2021.1945311

Oettmeier, K., & Hofmann, E. (2017). Additive manufacturing technology adoption: An empirical analysis of general and supply chain-related determinants. Journal of Business Economics, 87, 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0806-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0806-8

Padilla, M. A., & Divers, J. (2016). A comparison of composite reliability estimators: Coefficient omega confidence intervals in the current literature. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(3), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415593776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415593776

Pal, A. K., Mohanty, A. K., & Misra, M. (2021). Additive manufacturing technology of polymeric materials for customized products: Recent developments and future prospective. RSC Advances, 11(58), 36398–36438. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA04060J DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA04060J