Are perceptions of organizational communication color-blind?
A race comparative through a Chaos Theory Lens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v6i6.639Keywords:
Communication, Human and organizational factors, board gender diversityAbstract
With the global trend to prioritize tailoring communication strategies to meet the ever-changing diverse workforce, the study reveals a more nuanced reality. While much focus is placed on addressing communication differences, this papers position is that not enough focus is on our basic human need to communicate. This paper aims to evaluate whether certain aspects of the flow of information and communication are racially shared perceptions. Furthermore, through a Chaos Theory lens, evaluate the influence of managerial and organizational control mechanisms on various internal communication perceptions. A quantitative method was adopted, and data was collected from 63 non-management respondents in an automotive group in Kwa-Zulu Natal, by a closed-ended 5-point Likert scale. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to identify racially shared and divergent perceptions of organizational communication and the statistically significance. Key findings conclude that the free and accurate flow of information is a shared perception, regardless of race, and thus, a basic human need. Furthermore, the study demonstrates the significant influence managerial and organizational control mechanisms have on aspects of organizational communication, and challenges current academic positions that similar race dyads experience higher levels of trust. Finally, the paper concludes that the significant negative perception to control mechanisms, such as informal idea-sharing processes, flexible communication between levels, and active participation in SOPs and policy development, is a racially shared perception.
Downloads
References
Abdel-Monem, T., Bingham, S., & Marincic, J. (2010). Deliberation and diversity: Perceptions of small group discussions by race and ethnicity Small Group Research, 40(6) https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410377359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410377359
Adler, R. B. (2017). Understanding human communication (13th ed.) Oxford University Press https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=cat09081a&AN=dutc.oai.edge.durban.folio.ebsco.com.fs00001076.a2c885ba
Budros, A. (2000). Organizational types and organizational innovation: Downsizing among industrial, financial, and utility firms Sociological Forum, 15(2), 273–306 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007521608402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007521608402
Damayanthi, S., Gooneratne, T. N., & Jayakody, J. A. S. K. (2021). Logics, complexities and paradoxical tensions: Management controls in a clustered firm Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(2), 307–337 https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2019-4030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2019-4030
de Kinderen, S., & Kaczmarek-Heß, M. (2020). On model-based analysis of organizational structures: An assessment of current modeling approaches and application of multi-level modeling in support of design and analysis of organizational structures Software & Systems Modeling, 19(2), 313–343 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-019-00767-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-019-00767-4
Deloitte. (2021). The social enterprise in a world disrupted: Leading the shift from survive to thrive - 2021 Deloitte South Africa human capital trends https://www.deloitte.com/za/en/services/consulting/analysis/deloitte-south-africa-human-capital-trends-report-2021.html
Deloitte. (2022). The journey to 2030: Choosing the human agenda https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/human-capital/articles/journey-to-2030-seven-shifts-reshaping-organizations.html
Flower, J. (1993). The power of chaos Health Forum Journal, 36(5), 48
Frank, A., & Brownell, J. (1989). Organizational communication and behavior: Communicating to improve performance Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Greenberg, L. S. (2004). Emotion-focused therapy Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 11, 3–16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.388
Griffin, D. (2022). The effects of a tall organizational structure https://smallbusiness.chron.com/effects-tall-organizational-structure-287.html
Hudson, C. G. (2000). At the edge of chaos: A new paradigm for social work? Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2), 215–231 https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2000.10779003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2000.10779003
Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organising universe Pergamon Press
Jeanquart-Barone, S. (1993). Trust differences between supervisors and subordinates: Examining the role of race and gender Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 29(11/12), 1–11 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289993
Kaye, D. U. N. S.-G. U. N. H. R. C. S. R. o. t. P. a. P. o. t. R. t. F. o. O. a. E. (2017). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression: Note by the Secretary-General United Nations https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Opinion/A.66.290.pdf
Kazeroony, H. (2016). Sustainable management development in Africa: Building capabilities to serve African organisations Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714424
Killingsworth, P., & Eschenbacher, L. (2018). Designing organizational structures: Key thoughts for development American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 75(7), 482–492 https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp170657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp170657
Langosco, M. (2012). Dealing with the edge of chaos using emotional, cultural, and spiritual intelligence PMI® Global Congress 2012
Levy, D. (1994). Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 167–178 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151011
Liebhart, M., & Garcia-Lorenzo, L. (2010). Between planned and emergent change: Decision maker’s perceptions of managing change in organisations International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 10(5), 214–225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v10i05/49976
Lim, J. Y., & Moon, K.-K. (2021). Transformational leadership and employees' helping behavior in public organizations: Does organizational structure matter? Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 485–508 https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020977565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020977565
McLeod, S. (2018). Communication rights: Fundamental human rights for all International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(1), 3–11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2018.1428687
Montuori, A. (2011). Systems approach In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (Second Edition) (pp 414–421) Academic Press https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00212-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00212-0
Orbe, M. (1996). Laying the foundation for co-cultural theory: An inductive approach to studying “non-dominant” communication strategies and the factors that influence them Communication Studies, 47, 167–176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979609368473
Orbe, M. (1998). Constructing co-cultural theory: An explication of culture, power, and communication Sage DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483345321
Ostertagová, E., Ostertag, O., & Ková?, J. (2014). Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test Applied Mechanics and Materials, 611, 115–120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.611.115
Pipa?, M. D., & Bakri, C. L. (2019). The impact of internal communication in organizational management RAIS Conference Proceedings DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434075
Ruck, K., & Yaxley, H. (2013). Tracking the rise and rise of internal communication from the 1980s
Siegle, D. (2021). Purposive sampling https://researchbasics.education.uconn.edu/purposive-sampling
Silungwe, W. (2014). Communication across cultures and its implications: The case of Black Indigenous Zambians and White Western migrants living in Zambia University of South Africa http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/19032/dissertation_silungwe_w.pdf
Singh, H., & Singh, A. (2002). Principles of complexity and chaos theory in project execution: A new approach to management Cost Engineering, 44(12), 23–32 https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/principles-complexity-chaos-theory-project/docview/220447111
Trenholm, S. (2020). Thinking through communication: An introduction to the study of human communication Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003016366
Twente, U. o. (2003). Communication theories University of Twente https://www.utwente.nl/.uc/f9986009501022125cb01d5e2e5030c0add13d6eed6e400/Communication%20Theories%20University%20of%20Twente.pdf
UNESCO. (2009). The 2009 UNESCO Framework for Cultural Statistics (FCS) https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/doc10/BG-FCS-E.pdf
Van Tonder, C. (2004). Organisational change: Theory and practice Van Schaik
Van Cuilenburg, J. J., O, S., & G. W., N. (1998). Communication science Humanitas Publishing House
Welch, M. (2012). Appropriateness and acceptability: Employee perspectives of internal communication Public Relations Review, 38(2), 246–254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.017
Wells, C. V. (2001). Trust, gender, and race in the workplace Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 115–126
Wheatley, M. (1993). Chaos and complexity: What can science teach? Madison Big Learning Event, University of Wisconsin
Wheatley, M. J. (1994). Leadership and the new science: Learning about organizations from an orderly universe Berrett-Koehler Publishers
Widhiastuti, H. (2012). The effectiveness of communications in hierarchical organizational structure International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(3), 185–190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.93
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yachal du Plessis , Veena Parboo Rawjee

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© 2025 retained by the authors. Licensee BSC International Academy, Istanbul, Turkey. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).